<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Record of Record — the AI policy news desk</title>
    <link>https://recordofrecord.com</link>
    <atom:link href="https://recordofrecord.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Smart-brevity AI policy briefings: federal, international, courts, states, and federal-agency coverage with primary-source citations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 09:21:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>FTC settles with Cox Media Group, MindSift, 1010 Digital over deceptive &apos;active listening&apos; AI claims</title>
      <link>https://recordofrecord.com/articles/ftc-cox-media-mindsift-settlement</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://recordofrecord.com/articles/ftc-cox-media-mindsift-settlement</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Agencies</category>
      <dc:creator>Augusto Ferreira</dc:creator>
      <description>Three firms agree to pay $930,000 to settle charges they falsely claimed an AI-powered service could target localized ads based on conversations captured from smart devices.

Why it matters: Operation AI Comply, the FTC&apos;s enforcement vehicle for deceptive AI claims, continues under the Trump administration. The Cox Media settlement signals the FTC will keep pursuing deception cases even where the underlying AI claim is improbable on its face.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump postpones AI executive order, says it &apos;gets in the way&apos;</title>
      <link>https://recordofrecord.com/articles/trump-postpones-ai-executive-order</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://recordofrecord.com/articles/trump-postpones-ai-executive-order</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Federal</category>
      <dc:creator>Sam Ouellet</dc:creator>
      <description>Order would have created a voluntary pre-release review process for advanced AI models, with federal agencies given up to 90 days for security review.

Why it matters: The postponement leaves the federal pre-release review question — central to every frontier lab&apos;s planning since the Mythos disclosure — unresolved, with no successor timeline.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Newsom signs first-in-nation executive order on AI workforce disruption</title>
      <link>https://recordofrecord.com/articles/newsom-ai-workforce-executive-order</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://recordofrecord.com/articles/newsom-ai-workforce-executive-order</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>States</category>
      <dc:creator>Ines Mussa</dc:creator>
      <description>Order directs California agencies to develop severance standards, employment-insurance transition support, worker ownership models, and an AI playbook for modernizing job training.

Why it matters: California is now the first U.S. state to operationalize a state-level policy response to AI-driven workforce displacement. The order&apos;s outputs — WARN Act revisions, an AI playbook, expanded payroll tracking — will be templates other states pick up or push back against.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bartz v. Anthropic: $1.5 billion settlement clears fairness hearing</title>
      <link>https://recordofrecord.com/articles/bartz-v-anthropic-fairness-hearing</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://recordofrecord.com/articles/bartz-v-anthropic-fairness-hearing</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Courts</category>
      <dc:creator>Tate Hollinger</dc:creator>
      <description>Class action against Anthropic over training on pirated books concludes with the largest copyright settlement in U.S. history.

Why it matters: Judge Alsup&apos;s earlier split ruling — training on legally acquired copies is fair use, training on pirated copies is not — is now the operative line on AI copyright in the Northern District of California, codified by an industry-shaping settlement.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EU agrees on &apos;AI omnibus&apos; to simplify Act, extend deadlines</title>
      <link>https://recordofrecord.com/articles/eu-ai-act-omnibus-agreement</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://recordofrecord.com/articles/eu-ai-act-omnibus-agreement</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>International</category>
      <dc:creator>Tatiana Petrova</dc:creator>
      <description>Council and Parliament reach political agreement on amendments. New prohibitions on nudifier apps. Regulatory sandbox deadline postponed to August 2, 2027.

Why it matters: The omnibus is Europe&apos;s first major adjustment to the AI Act since GPAI obligations took effect last August. The transparency-grace-period cut from six months to three accelerates the labelling requirement on synthetic content.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
