The public comment period on the FTC’s proposed “suppression of accuracy” AI policy closed July 31, and five weeks later the agency still hasn’t said whether it’ll finalize the statement, revise it, or shelve it. That silence is the story.

The proposed statement was published July 1 in the Federal Register under docket FTC-2026-0859 (91 FR 41638), issued pursuant to Executive Order 14365 signed December 11, 2025. The Commission authorized the notice on a 2-0 vote. Regulations.gov logged 40 comments. Modest paperwork for a document that reframes Section 5 of the FTC Act around AI outputs.

The theory is already written. Systems “steered” toward undisclosed objectives can constitute consumer deception, and the statement refers broadly to “AI companies” without distinguishing developers from deployers. Winston Taylor’s analysis reads that ambiguity as deliberate, arguing that entities making consumer-facing AI representations may face Section 5 liability “regardless of whether they built the underlying model,” and points to the FTC’s 2025 DoNotPay order as the precedent. Covington adds that disclosures “cannot be buried in terms of service or fine print” to cure a steering problem.

For a small business, that’s the whole exposure. Whatever the AI writes for your ad, your outreach, your pricing page, it becomes your representation the moment you publish it. The rule doesn’t have to be final for that logic to bite; it only has to be plausible enough to guide an enforcement decision.

Which is the position deployers now occupy: a fully drafted enforcement framework, no adoption date, and no obligation on the Commission to tell anyone which way it’s leaning.

Sources

Sources